Monday, April 13, 2009

Blind But Now I Should See?

The destruction of the Constitution has not just started over the last sixty years as many believe; it began eroding when Lincoln used his power to deny states rights. I am opposed to any man owning any man as chattel, and to protect one person’s rights, is to oppress another, and had we consistently listen to God, no man, regardless of color would have been in bondage. "We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution." -Abraham Lincoln Hypocrisy?
It is easy to have the elected strip away the rights of the individuals or states. An elected legislature can and will eventually strip away freedoms of American’s just as easy as a monarch can, as they believe they are under a mandate or under the care and control of globalize corporations.

If you are not taught the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence by teachers and parents, or, you are a sluggard and fail to see the importance of an education, then how will you know what rights you have in the law, if you do not know the law. How will you know what those in power will take from you, if you have no inventory of what has been given you by the founding fathers? Ignorance is no excuse, to excuse the ignorant.
Inherited in the foundation of this country, are two documents, confirmed by signatures that our rights and liberties are from God, not man, nor government. To accept less, is to give up your freedoms and spit in the face of the founders and those who came before you and died to protect it. "We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams--October 11, 1798
In order to remove freedoms and demolish the Constitution and individual freedoms, first you must divide and conquer those within that union, by their lust, greed, and self-serving interest. You consistently brain-wash the children through public education, consistent with progressive and nationalist teachings, and removing God from site of public disclosure or schools, dissolving what is moral and just. This is a typical military maneuver where you divide, cut supply lines, control communications and conquer. Say this is not happening? Well let’s dissect this last sentence.
First divide by attracting special interest like pro-choice/pro-life; democrat/republican; homosexual/heterosexual; hyphenated-Americans/native born Americans; progressives/conservatives, pro-gun/anti-gun; socialist/capitalist; etc.,get the point!
Cut off supply lines-economy/control the banks, manufacturing, de-value the dollar and seek a global currency. Are we warm yet?
Control communications through major news networks disseminating divisive communications to continue breaking apart the union looking for the weakest links, the poor and promising them equal wealth by taking from the hard working and give it to the lazy. Who do you think the lazy will vote for?
Elias Boudinot (1740–1821) was a lawyer and statesman from New Jersey who was a delegate to the Continental Congress and a U.S Congressman for New Jersey from 1789 until 1994 where he refused to serve any longer. He also served as President of the Continental Congress from 1782 to 1783 and Director of the U.S. Mint from 1795 until 1805. Elias Boudinot:“Be religiously careful in our choice of all public officers . . . and judge of the tree(person) by its fruits(actions & deeds).”
How many of us pick our politicians by the fruits of their deeds and personal lives? How many of us actually investigate instead of just listening to a particular party or television? How many of us have been disappointed in their choices?
I constantly hear from readers, friends, and acquaintances that they choose the party that is the closest to their beliefs. I ask them: “does this party’s platforms contain all your beliefs or just some”? They reply: “well most of them anyway”. I then ask: “so you compromise with some of your beliefs, relinquishing the balance of your beliefs”. What would you keep and what would you let go of? When I had cancer, I refused chemotherapy/radiation because of two issues. First one being: "Whoever seeks to keep his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life will preserve it", Luke 17:33 and Second I saw too many of my Vietnam brothers exposed to Agent Orange like myself die from diseases or sickness and not the cancer, so I chose God's will first, not compromising my faith, and macrobiotic dieting second. I made the right choice as I have now been cancer free going on twenty years.
I have had some who read my column’s saying that I seem to emphasize homosexuality more than other issues. I attack all abominations that are unpleasant to God as I am an equal opportunity basher. I do not compromise my beliefs, as I do not compromise my freedom, or freedoms of my children and grandchildren. I do not accept abortion, murder, pedophiles, rapist, liars, fornicators, adultery and hold them all in contempt equal to homosexuals. I pray for the sinners as I am a sinner, but I hate the sin as it is destructive not only of the individual soul, but the very soul of this country, and the principles for which it was born.

The destruction of this country does not come from the outer boundaries of our borders, but within as Nikita Kruschev said in the early sixties, "that our destruction will come within" (paraphrased). Our laxed immigration policies, nationalist, communist will dissolve and destroy, while your heads are in buried in the sand, and yes we are still blind and do not see.

No comments: